Mmm, rambling thoughts, some waffling, venting and ruffling feathers .. about the obscenity that is Big Pharma!!! Its absurd and grotestque.

Medications do not save lives and do not cure. It is a belief system based on flagrant lies and skewed research, in most instances.

Studies show that during World I & World War II wounded soldiers, lived longer, without all the modern high tech modalities than do soldiers hospitalized during the last thirty years. Emergency surgery can save life, but then side effects from anesthetics, analgesics, antibiotics, may cause illness later on.

In addition, studies show that 6 out of 10 deaths in hospitals are attributed to medications. (posted on the forum from medical journal).

All meds and vaccines affect the mitochondria leading to more disease state, eventually.

Those who keep taking Fqs and say they are fine, they will develop some type of illness and will not even make the correlation.

This process differs from ADRs or suffering from side effects. The end result is that it can kill, maim, cause slow disease process spanning over many years, leading to a poor quality of life.

A healthy diet, stress reduction, exercise, good nutrition, regular gentle detoxing, avoidance of environmental pollution, keeping away from dentists and doctors, keeping well INFORMED, will keep disease at bay. Vigilance and health conscious. Early signs of disease process can be treated and in most cases reversed.

When we do hear of people who have reversed their late stage cancers, condemned by oncologists, or those who were cured of "cystic fibrosis" or Parkinson, or regained their sights, why do most people choose to either ignore this or simply choose not to believe? Why the skepticism?

Why the lack of respect for those very doctors who are speaking out against Allopathic Medicine, loosing their jobs, reputation, and career in the process? Instead, they are stripped of their medical license to practice and rejected both by their peers and the very people they seek to protect!!

Why not take heed? Why are they almost ridiculed? Why would more MDs speak out if they are not being supported by us?

Ghost writers, falsified drug trials results, publishers colluding by conjuring out of thin air medical journals (Elsvier), excluding those suffering ADRs in Phase I during drug trial, paying large sum of money to psychiatrist to endorse dangerous ineffective psychotropics, and to scientists and doctors in regards to poorly designed stents, DSM-IV growing lists of "mental" disorders (shyness now called social anxiety etc..), WHO Executive Board Members are totally corrupt - affiliated with PharmaCorps, unrestrained, altered the definition of "pandemic" in order to sell dangerous untested vaccines, based on poor science, for PROFIT. Widespread corruption involving agronomy, politicians, The list is long ...

Why does the mass choose to believe the Establishment?

Whenever I am at a Hospital talking to patients, they proudly hold on to their box full of pills, whilst relaying information about their failing healths, side effects and long list of diseases caused by their meds. Some of them suffered ADRs but continue to ignore obvoius connection.. Instead, they rush around seeing more doctors, given new labels, and more pills,

These patients end up in a cesspool of symptoms, feeling even more ill. Dying of a slow painful death over a period of ten to twenty years, with poor quality of life, munching away those very pills that are killing them slowly.

Why do they bury their heads in the sand, hoping for a cure, whilst health degenerating further.

I met a man with diabetes Type II. He was talking about insulin, and I was talking about throwing it away, altering his diet, taking vits and supps. Thanks to his "life saving insulin" he had a heart attack, followed by valve dysfuntion, ulcers on his legs, chronic vertigo, and multitude incapacitating symptoms. Is his diabetes controlled or cured? NO, instead, he is now taking more pills, deteriorating. I doubt he will live beyond the age of 45.

Studies have shown that those who take anti arrythmic are more likely die of sudden cardiac death, than those who don't.

Recently, published - Aspirin is NOT effective as a blood thinner and is no longer recommended. Ha, but, BUT, it will be useful for something else. New research shows that taking Aspirin reduces the chances of developing breast cancer, the list goes on.

Allopathic medicine is not an option. There are other therapeutic modalities, less toxic, less invasive worth exploring. So called "Alternative Medicine" should be regulated, open to scrutiny, and validation.

Having spent the last two years or so reading up medical journals, it is apparent, that ALL meds cause damage to the mitochondria, regardless, of side effects of those unfortunate suffering ADRs. (see Mitochondria dysunction caused by meds published articles and FDA threads).

All meds will cause damage leading to diabetes, auto immune illnesses, malfunction of the immune systems, metabolic syndromes (for which there are no labels yet), cardiac dysfunction, organ failure, neurological and degenerative illnesses and more.

Unlike those who suffer from ADRs, disease state will take a few years to develop. The connection is rarely made.

A new paradigm is emerging in allopathic medicine, that is cellular medicine, and Epigenetics of vitamins, supplements and various compounds from fruits, vegetables, herbs etc... Phytochemistry is more or less the same.

Is it new? NO, it is 4000 years old and been practiced by Ayurvedic doctors and Chinese doctors successfully, if the disease is caught early, the patient is willing to make life style changes, including breathing exercises.

No longer angry, replaced by sadness. I see the children of my friends born, beautiful, healthy. A few years later, post vaccines, struggling with asthma, allergies, moody, over active, infections and autoimmune illnesses etc ..

Enough waffling for now!!

I stumbled upon this article (below) today, and thought, it might be of interest.

"Jail Time for Executives Might Stop Drug Crimes" -
BusinessWeek
FYI
http://www.ahrp.org

"When Drug Makers' Profits Outweigh Penalties" appearing in today's Washington Post is an updated version of David Evans' riveting, prize winning investigative report, Big Pharma's Crime Spree, published in Bloomberg News, December 2009. Some of the tables from the expanded Bloomberg Magazine version can be accessed here, Big Pharma's Crime Spree. One thing remains unchanged:

"Across the United States, pharmaceutical companies have pleaded guilty to criminal charges or paid penalties in civil cases when the Justice Department finds that they deceptively marketed drugs for unapproved uses, putting millions of people at risk of chest infections, heart attacks, suicidal impulses or death."

The biggest fine ever imposed in U.S. history, $2.3 billion against recidivist Pfizer, represented a mere 14% of the revenue stream from selling the drugs at issue over seven years.

"So immune to criminal sanctions was that the company launched its off-label Bextra campaign at the same time the company was pleading guilty to doing precisely the same thing with other drugs. The anti-inflammatory medication was later yanked from the market because of increased risk of heart attacks and stroke."

Rather than being tried for their crimes rogue corporate giants in the pharmaceutical industry is being subsidized and the financial industr (giants deemed "too big to fail")-is being bailed out by US taxpayers.

A follow-up on Evans' report, Bloomberg News columnist, Ann Woolner took the bull by the horns in her column, "Jail Time for Executives Might Stop Drug Crimes" published by BusinessWeek (below) noting that: "Pharmaceutical and medical device companies repeatedly signal they just don't seem to care what the law says if they can find a way around it."

For example, "internal documents show Johnson & Johnson planning a push for $302 million in geriatric sales for a drug after the FDA had said that for the elderly, the medication wasn't as helpful and carried more risks than the company had claimed.The company denies wrongdoing."

"Throwing a few company executives in jail might do the trick."

The problem is the difficulty in proving intent. However, the Food and Drug Act, allows misdemeanor convictions without proof of intent to do wrongdoing. But until now, the FDA did not prosecute pharmaceutical executives.

So, the very rogue pharmaceutical companies that have pled guilty to criminal marketing of toxic, mostly useless drugs who paid hundreds of millions-even over a billion dollars in fines-have continued to profiteer from defective hazardous products.

Unless the FDA enforces the prosecutorial provisions of the FDC; unless Congress supports health-care fraud prosecutions; and unless the Obama administration will prohibit taxpayer reimbursement for criminally marketed
drugs and medical devices, rogue companies will continue profit from harm producing, hazardous drugs that pose risks of disability and death.